Choosing the right tennis court surface is critical for performance, safety, and long-term durability. Schools, clubs, and stadiums must evaluate material type, playability, maintenance needs, and weather resistance before deciding. Among the most popular surfaces are acrylic, silicon PU, and EPDM. This guide compares their advantages, drawbacks, and ideal applications.
Acrylic surfaces are made from multiple layers of acrylic resin and color pigments, often applied over concrete or asphalt bases.
Advantages:
Smooth and uniform playing surface with consistent ball bounce
Durable and UV-resistant
Available in vibrant colors, easy to repaint
Cost-effective for schools and community courts
Drawbacks:
Limited shock absorption; can be hard on joints
Less cushioning compared to PU or EPDM surfaces
Not ideal for heavy rain areas unless paired with proper drainage
Best For: Recreational courts, school courts, and budget-friendly facilities.
Silicon PU surfaces combine polyurethane with EPDM or rubber granules, offering a resilient, cushioned top layer.
Advantages:
Excellent shock absorption, reducing injuries for players
Uniform ball bounce and surface consistency
Highly weather-resistant, suitable for outdoor and all-season use
Long lifespan with proper maintenance
Drawbacks:
Higher installation cost compared to acrylic
Requires professional installation for best performance
Best For: Professional training facilities, school courts with frequent use, and stadiums hosting competitions.
EPDM surfaces consist of EPDM rubber granules bound with polyurethane or other binders, creating a cushioned and slip-resistant playing area.
Advantages:
Soft underfoot, reducing impact on joints
Good slip resistance and player safety
Can be used as a hybrid surface for multi-sport courts
Drawbacks:
Color may fade over time due to UV exposure
Requires more maintenance to preserve surface quality
Slightly less uniform ball bounce compared to acrylic or PU
Best For: Schools, recreational facilities, and multi-purpose courts.
Performance Needs: Competitive facilities require uniform bounce and high traction, favoring silicon PU or acrylic.
Budget: Acrylic surfaces are more cost-effective; silicon PU is higher-end, and EPDM offers a middle ground.
Maintenance: Acrylic courts are easier to clean and repaint; silicon PU and EPDM require regular inspections and minor repairs.
Climate: Wet or humid areas benefit from silicon PU or EPDM due to better water drainage and weather resistance.
Safety: Shock absorption and slip resistance are crucial for schools and recreational courts.
Ensure the base layer is smooth, level, and properly drained.
Follow manufacturer instructions for layering, curing, and coatings.
Use certified installers for silicon PU or EPDM surfaces to achieve optimal performance.
Plan for routine maintenance, including cleaning, repainting lines, and applying protective coatings as needed.
Selecting the best tennis court surface depends on your facility’s budget, usage, climate, and performance expectations.
Acrylic surfaces: Cost-effective, smooth, and durable, ideal for recreational and school courts.
Silicon PU surfaces: High-performance, cushioned, and weather-resistant, perfect for competitive and frequently used courts.
EPDM surfaces: Soft, safe, and versatile, suitable for multi-purpose or school courts.
By choosing the right surface and ensuring professional installation and maintenance, tennis courts can provide years of safe, consistent play for athletes of all levels.
Previous: None
Please leave message
Please leave message 
+86 181 2230 3341
